Maca Root Benefits for Men: What Does the Science Say? (2026)

Maca Root Benefits for Men: What Does the Science Say? (2026) — Blue Power

By · · · 12 min read

In 30 seconds

Evidence: In a 2009 trial, maca extract was associated with a measured improvement in 40km time-trial performance after 14 days in trained cyclists — trial evidence, not a claim about this product.

Timing: Energy and physical performance vary with sleep, training load, diet and age — not with any single supplement.

Next step: Get your baseline levels (e.g. testosterone, vitamin D, zinc) via your GP or a UK service such as Medichecks or Thriva — your own numbers to track over time.

Maca root (Lepidium meyenii) is a cruciferous vegetable grown almost exclusively above 4,000 metres in the Peruvian Andes. It has been used as a food and traditional remedy for over 2,000 years — and over the past two decades it has become one of the most-searched men's health supplements in the UK. In a 12-week double-blind RCT, 1,500–3,000mg/day of gelatinised maca was associated with significantly improved self-reported sexual desire from week 8 onwards, and the effect was independent of testosterone, oestradiol, and mood scores (Gonzales et al., Andrologia, 2002).

For UK men over 40 looking at herbal supplements for men, that "independent of testosterone" detail is what makes maca interesting. Most traditional aphrodisiac claims centre on hormonal pathways — maca appears to work through a different route from hormone-focused ingredients. This guide walks through what the clinical evidence actually shows: where it's strong, where it's weaker, what dose works, and how to choose a quality product.

TL;DR — Key Takeaways
  • In a 12-week RCT, gelatinised maca (1,500–3,000mg/day) improved sexual desire from week 8 — with no change in testosterone (Gonzales 2002)
  • A 4-month trial in 9 men found total sperm count rose +84% and motile sperm count +109% (Gonzales 2001)
  • A 2023 RCT (n=80) of gelatinised maca in men with late-onset hypogonadism symptoms found significant improvements in IIEF erectile-function, IPSS prostate, and AMS ageing scores (Shin 2023)
  • Effective clinical dose: 1,500–3,000mg/day of root powder or equivalent extract for 8–12 weeks
  • Three colour types: yellow (most widely studied for general men's health), black (strongest fertility/performance data), red (most prostate-relevant data, mostly animal)
  • EFSA has not authorised health claims for maca; UK retailers cannot legally claim specific benefits on the label

What Is Maca Root and How Does It Work?

Maca is a cruciferous root vegetable in the same family as broccoli, cabbage, and mustard. It grows on the high-altitude puna of central Peru, in conditions hostile enough that few other crops survive: thin air, intense UV, freezing nights, and poor mineral soils. Local Andean populations have eaten it dried and gelatinised for centuries as both a food staple and a traditional Andean remedy.

The bioactive profile is unusual. The strongest evidence so far points to macamides and macaenes — polyunsaturated fatty acid amides found nowhere else in nature. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 studies concluded that macamides produce a "large effect" on physical performance markers, although the authors emphasised that most data is still from animal models and called for more human trials (Huerta Ojeda et al., Nutrients, 2025).

Beyond the macamides, maca contains glucosinolates (sulphur-containing antioxidant compounds), plant sterols like beta-sitosterol, and small amounts of alkaloids such as macaridine and lepidiline. The current working hypothesis is that maca acts on the central nervous system — particularly the endocannabinoid system — rather than on the gonadal-hormonal axis. That fits with the trial data: across multiple RCTs, sexual desire and function improve, while serum testosterone, LH, FSH, prolactin, and oestradiol stay essentially unchanged.

Why doesn't maca change testosterone levels?
This is the most consistent finding across maca studies, and it surprises a lot of people. Multiple RCTs measured circulating hormones before and after supplementation and found no significant shift. Yet in those trials, sexual desire and erectile function scores improved while hormone levels stayed unchanged (Gonzales et al., 2002; Shin et al., 2023). The current theory: maca's macamides are studied for neural pathways involved in motivation and arousal, separate from the gonadal-hormonal axis. Because the trials measured no change in testosterone, maca's effects appear to run through a non-hormonal route.

A 2024 review in Pharmacological Research went further and argued that maca shouldn't be treated as a single compound at all: "Not all colours have the same function and must be personalised to the intended outcome" (Beharry & Heinrich, Pharmacological Research, 2024). Yellow, black, and red maca have measurably different bioactive profiles and different research records — an important detail if you're comparing UK products on the shelf.

What Are the Science-Backed Benefits of Maca Root for Men?

Active middle-aged man cycling through Andean-style mountain landscape representing maca root's traditional use for stamina and vitality
Five areas have been studied in clinical trials in men: sexual desire (assessed by self-report questionnaires), sperm quality, erectile function, physical energy, and mood.

1. Sexual Desire: What the Trials Show Strongest Evidence

The most frequently replicated finding concerns self-reported sexual desire. In Gonzales et al. (2002), a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of 57 healthy men, both 1,500mg and 3,000mg/day of gelatinised maca were associated with significantly improved self-reported sexual desire from week 8 onwards, with no statistically significant difference between the two doses (Gonzales et al., Andrologia, 2002). Crucially, the desire improvement was independent of changes in testosterone, oestradiol, or mood scores.

A separate trial in men with SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction — a population that's particularly hard to help — found that in Dording et al. (2008), 3,000mg/day of maca root was associated with significantly improved sexual desire and function scores on both the ASEX and MGH-SFQ questionnaires (p<0.05) (Dording et al., CNS Neurosci Ther, 2008). SSRI-related sexual side effects affect a significant fraction of men on antidepressants, and few non-pharmaceutical options have any RCT data at all in this group.

Maca Root: Key Clinical Trial Results in Men Maca Root: Key Clinical Results in Men Effect size from baseline in RCTs (1,500–3,000mg/day, 8–16 weeks) Gonzales '02 sexual desire (n=57) Gonzales '01 sperm count (n=9) Zenico '09 IIEF-5 (n=50) Shin '23 LOH-symptom men (n=80) Lee '22 sperm meta-analysis 0% +50% +100% Significant from wk 8 +84% total sperm IIEF-5 +1.6 (p<0.001) IIEF/IPSS/AMS p<0.0001 Pooled WMD 2.22 (NS, I²=91%) Healthy men LOH/ED men Pooled meta-analysis
Sources: Gonzales et al. (2002, 2001), Zenico et al. (2009), Shin et al. (2023), Lee et al. (2022 meta-analysis). Single-arm and small-n trials are encouraging but the 2022 meta-analysis on sperm shows the field still needs larger multi-centre RCTs.
In Gonzales et al. (2002), a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT (n=57), gelatinised maca at 1,500mg or 3,000mg/day was associated with improved self-reported sexual desire from week 8, with no significant difference between doses and no change in serum testosterone, oestradiol, or mood scores. The implication: the observed desire effect appeared to be mediated outside the classical hormonal axis (Gonzales et al., 2002).

Editorial note — what this means in context: The "no change in testosterone but real change in desire" pattern observed in Gonzales et al. (2002) points to a central-nervous-system effect rather than a hormonal one. This central-nervous-system pattern is separate from the gonadal-hormonal axis, and the trials did not show a change in testosterone. Men with clinically low testosterone should speak to their GP rather than rely on any food supplement.

— Blue Power Research Team, reviewing Gonzales et al. (2002)

Study Funding Transparency

Most maca trials have come from a small group of Peruvian research teams. That isn't a flaw on its own — Peru is where the plant is studied most seriously — but it means the evidence base is geographically concentrated. Funding patterns:

Study Sample Funding / Setting Status
Gonzales 2002 (sexual desire) n=57, healthy men San Marcos University, Peru Academic
Gonzales 2001 (sperm) n=9, healthy men San Marcos University, Peru Academic
Zenico 2009 (mild ED) n=50, men with mild ED University of Bologna, Italy Academic
Dording 2008 (SSRI dysfunction) n=20, men + women on SSRIs Massachusetts General Hospital Academic
Shin 2023 (LOH symptoms) n=80, men with LOH Korean academic, supplement provided by manufacturer Mixed
Lee 2022 (meta-analysis) 5 RCTs pooled, sperm focus Academic review Independent

Most positive maca trials are academic rather than industry-funded, which adds credibility. The independently funded 2022 meta-analysis on sperm found a positive trend but high heterogeneity and a non-significant pooled effect — a fair signal that the sexual-desire trial data (Gonzales 2002, Dording 2008) is more consistent than the fertility data so far.

2. Sperm Quality and Male Fertility Moderate Evidence

In a 4-month trial of 9 healthy adult men taking 1,500mg or 3,000mg of maca daily, researchers measured semen parameters and reported sperm concentration +35%, total sperm count +84%, and motile sperm count +109%. None of these changes correlated with shifts in FSH, LH, prolactin, oestradiol, or testosterone — pointing again to a non-hormonal mechanism (Gonzales et al., Asian J Androl, 2001). These trial doses (1,500–3,000mg) are far above Blue Power's 50mg Maca Root dose and cannot be transferred to Blue Power as a label claim.

The honest caveat: a 2022 meta-analysis pooling 5 RCTs on maca and semen quality found the overall effect on sperm concentration was not statistically significant (pooled WMD 2.22, 95% CI −2.94 to 7.37, p=0.4) with very high heterogeneity (I²=91%) (Lee et al., Front Pharmacol, 2022). The individual trials are encouraging, but the pooled signal isn't yet strong enough to call this a settled benefit. If fertility is your specific goal, maca is reasonable as part of a stack but shouldn't be the only intervention.

3. Erectile Function

Zenico et al. (2009) ran a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 50 men with mild ED. The 2,400mg/day maca dry-extract group improved IIEF-5 scores by +1.6 points vs +0.5 for placebo (p<0.001), with parallel improvements in general and sexual wellbeing scores (Zenico et al., Andrologia, 2009).

A larger and more recent trial reinforces the signal. Shin et al. (2023) randomised 80 men with symptoms of late-onset hypogonadism to 3,000mg/day gelatinised maca or placebo for 12 weeks. The maca group showed significant improvements in IIEF (erectile function), IPSS (lower urinary tract / prostate symptoms), and AMS (Ageing Males' Symptoms) scores, with a marked reduction in ADAM-positive rates (p<0.0001) (Shin et al., World J Men's Health, 2023).

4. Physical Energy and Exercise Performance

Stone et al. (2009) tested maca extract in 8 trained cyclists and reported a significant improvement in 40-km time-trial performance vs baseline (p=0.01) after just 14 days of supplementation (Stone et al., J Ethnopharmacol, 2009). A larger 2023 trial in 44 elite athletes used 5,000mg/day of black maca for 8 weeks and reported improved physical fitness markers, lower inflammation, and improved mitochondrial biogenesis (Holgado et al., Nutrients, 2023).

The 2025 macamide meta-analysis adds mechanistic support: across 21 studies the unique fatty-acid amides in maca were reported to have a "large effect" on physical performance markers, although most were animal trials (Huerta Ojeda et al., 2025); these are trial findings, not claims for any product. This is why maca is studied as an everyday adaptogen rather than a stimulant.

5. Mood and Wellbeing

Across multiple trials, mood improvement appears as a secondary outcome. The Shin 2023 RCT documented significant gains on the AMS questionnaire (psychological, somatic, and sexual domains). Zenico 2009 reported improved general wellbeing alongside the IIEF gains. The Dording 2008 SSRI trial — though primarily about sexual function — also tracked mood and saw no negative effects, which matters because some herbal compounds in this category can interact with serotonin systems.

Maca Forms, Colours & Quality Standardisation

Two structural choices matter when buying maca: the form (raw vs gelatinised vs concentrated extract) and the colour type (yellow vs black vs red). Both influence what you actually take, and neither is usually obvious on a UK shelf.

Gelatinised maca is raw maca that's been heat-pressure treated to remove the indigestible starch. The result is easier on the stomach, more concentrated in active compounds per gram, and what most positive RCTs have used. Raw maca is cheaper but causes bloating in roughly a third of users in early weeks, which is part of why raw-powder studies sometimes show higher dropout. Concentrated extracts standardised to macamide content can deliver the same active compounds at a lower mg dose — useful in multi-ingredient formulas where each ingredient gets a moderate share.

Form Typical dose Pros Cons Verdict
Gelatinised powder 1,500–3,000mg/day Best-studied form; easy on the gut; concentrated Earthy taste; needs daily mixing Best Used in Gonzales 2002 and Shin 2023
Raw powder 1,500–3,000mg/day Cheapest; closest to traditional use Bloating, gas, harder to digest OK if tolerated
Concentrated extract 50–500mg/day Standardised macamides; convenient capsule dose Quality varies wildly between brands Best in multi-ingredient formulas
Maca gummies Varies (often under-dosed) Easy to take, taste-masked Sugar load; rarely deliver clinical doses Avoid for clinical effect

On colour: yellow maca is the most common type and the basis for most published clinical trials in men, including those assessing sexual desire and fertility outcomes. Black maca has the strongest data for sperm count and physical performance. Red maca has the most prostate-relevant evidence, though most of it is still preclinical. A 2024 review explicitly recommended choosing colour by intended outcome (Beharry & Heinrich, 2024). This is the kind of decision a multi-ingredient formula sidesteps by choosing the form best matched to the broader stack — a topic we cover in detail in our Maca Root Extract bioavailability and form comparison guide.

How Much Maca Should Men Take? Clinical Dosage Guide

Wooden spoon with maca root powder next to capsules and root pieces, representing different dosage forms of maca for men
Clinical trials in men used 1,500–3,000mg/day of root powder or equivalent extract for 8–12 weeks.

Across the published trials in men, the dosing pattern is fairly consistent. 1,500–3,000mg/day of gelatinised root powder, taken with food, for at least 8 weeks. Higher doses (up to 5,000mg) have been used in athletic studies without adverse events but produced little additional benefit over 1,500–3,000mg for the outcomes measured. Below 1,500mg, the self-reported desire effect tends to fall short of significance.

Key dose-response signal: in Gonzales et al. (2002), a RCT (n=57), both 1,500mg/day and 3,000mg/day of gelatinised maca were associated with essentially the same improvement in self-reported sexual desire — both statistically significant from week 8 onwards. Below this range, the observed effect is unreliable; above it, additional benefit is unclear. The practical takeaway: 1,500–3,000mg/day is the studied working window, with 8 weeks the minimum trial period (Gonzales et al., 2002).
When to take it: Maca is best taken in the morning or with breakfast. Some users report mild stimulation if taken late in the evening, similar to caffeine sensitivity but milder. Take it with food to minimise any gut discomfort — this is especially important for raw maca powder. Consistency matters: trials show benefits from week 8 onwards, so plan a 12-week run rather than a one-week trial.

For men taking maca as part of a multi-ingredient formula, Blue Power contains a 50mg concentrated extract alongside other ingredients including Oat extract (Avena sativa), Korean Ginseng, zinc, and L-arginine. The single-ingredient approach (3,000mg of straight powder daily) suits men using maca on its own; a concentrated extract in a multi-ingredient tablet suits men who prefer one tablet over several.

Is Maca Root Safe? Side Effects & UK Regulatory Status

The safety profile is one of maca's strongest features. The US National Library of Medicine's LiverTox database rates maca's likelihood of causing liver injury as "E" (unlikely) — the lowest-risk category (NCBI LiverTox NBK548552). Across published RCTs, no serious adverse events have been reported at doses up to 5,000mg/day for periods of weeks to months.

The most common minor side effect is mild gastrointestinal discomfort — bloating, gas, occasional loose stools. In one study this was reported in roughly a third of participants on raw maca, and dropped sharply when participants switched to gelatinised maca. A handful of users report mild jitteriness or sleep disturbance if maca is taken late in the day, consistent with its mild adaptogenic stimulation.

Who should consult their GP before taking maca:
  • Thyroid conditions: Maca's glucosinolates may affect thyroid function, particularly with a low-iodine diet
  • Hormone-sensitive conditions: Although maca doesn't appear to change hormone levels, caution is reasonable for men with prostate cancer or other hormone-sensitive conditions
  • Blood pressure medication: Some evidence that maca may modestly lower blood pressure — monitor if taking antihypertensives
  • Anticoagulant therapy: Limited interaction data; speak to your GP if on warfarin or DOACs
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding partner: Insufficient safety data — not recommended in these contexts

UK regulatory status: Maca is legal to buy and sell in the UK as a food supplement and is widely stocked. However, EFSA has not authorised any specific health claims for maca under EU Regulation 432/2012. Health claims relating to vitality, fertility, and hormonal function were submitted but placed "on hold" as part of the EU botanical review process. The practical effect: UK retailers cannot legally make specific benefit claims on the product label, which is why you'll see careful wording like "traditionally used" rather than direct effect claims.

Across published RCTs in men spanning 2 to 16 weeks at doses from 1,500 to 5,000mg/day, no serious adverse events were reported. Minor side effects (GI discomfort, occasional sleep disturbance) were dose- and form-dependent. The LiverTox classification of "E (unlikely)" places maca in the lowest-risk category for hepatotoxicity (NCBI LiverTox).

How to Choose Quality Maca Root in the UK

The UK shelf is full of maca products with very different actual potencies. The differences that matter:

  • Form — gelatinised over raw: Look for "gelatinised" or "pre-cooked" maca. This isn't gelatin (it's vegan); it just refers to a heat-pressure process that removes starch. Gelatinised maca was used in the best-evidenced published RCTs in men, including Gonzales 2002 and Shin 2023.
  • Colour transparency: Quality producers state whether the maca is yellow, black, red, or a tri-colour blend. "Maca extract" with no colour information often means whatever the supplier had.
  • Origin — Peru, above 4,000m: Authentic maca grows above 4,000 metres in the Andes. Some products use lowland-grown maca cultivated outside Peru — the bioactive profile is reliably weaker.
  • Third-party testing: Heavy metals (lead, cadmium, arsenic) and microbial limits. Cruciferous root crops accumulate soil metals readily, so a Certificate of Analysis matters more for maca than for many supplements.
  • Dose transparency: Avoid proprietary blends. You should know exactly how many milligrams of maca you're getting per serving and whether it's powder or extract equivalent.
The "extract ratio" trap: Many UK maca products advertise ratios like "10:1" or "20:1" extract. As with Tongkat Ali, these numbers describe how much raw root was used per gram of finished extract — they don't tell you the macamide content or the actual active-compound concentration. A 10:1 product from one supplier and a 10:1 product from another can have very different active-compound levels. Ask for macamide content or, failing that, stick with whole gelatinised powder where the dose-response data is clearest.

Why Does Blue Power Include 50mg Maca Root Extract in Its Formula?

Blue Power Ingredient Spotlight: Maca Root Extract 50mg

Blue Power contains 50mg Maca Root Extract alongside seven complementary ingredients in one daily tablet — GMP certified, UK manufactured, with fully transparent dosing (no proprietary blends).

Full formula per tablet:

Oat extract (Avena sativa) 10:1 50mg · Shilajit 50mg · Maca Root Extract 50mg · Korean Ginseng 5:1 100mg · L-Arginine 50mg · Zinc 10mg · Vitamin C 80mg

The formula includes zinc, for which EFSA has authorised the following claims: Zinc contributes to the maintenance of normal testosterone levels in the blood. Zinc contributes to normal fertility and reproduction. It also includes Vitamin C, for which EFSA has authorised: Vitamin C contributes to the reduction of tiredness and fatigue. Vitamin C contributes to normal energy-yielding metabolism.

For men who prefer one tablet over several, a complete formula removes the friction of buying, dosing, and timing multiple supplements. Blue Power's approach is transparent, multi-ingredient dosing rather than a maximum dose of any single compound.

Try Blue Power — Contains Maca Root Extract 50mg

One daily tablet. 8 science-backed ingredients. GMP certified, UK made, fully transparent dosing.

Get Blue Power — Free UK Delivery

No subscription required  ·  30-day supply  ·  Free standard UK delivery

Reporting side effects. Food supplements are generally well tolerated, but if you notice an unexpected reaction to any supplement you can report it to the UK regulator through the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme. Always tell your GP or pharmacist about supplements you take, especially alongside prescription medicines.

Why Blue Power uses these doses

Blue Power is a once-daily multi-ingredient tablet, not a single high-dose extract. That is a deliberate design choice, and it explains why some ingredient amounts are lower than the doses used in single-ingredient clinical trials.

Each ingredient is included at an amount tied to its own nutritional role and to UK safe-intake limits. For example, zinc is included at 10 mg — 100% of the EU Nutrient Reference Value — which is the amount at which the authorised claim applies: “Zinc contributes to the maintenance of normal testosterone levels in the blood.” Larger amounts are not more useful: the 2020 FAZST trial found no benefit from high-dose zinc in men who already had enough, and intakes above 40 mg/day risk copper depletion.

The same principle applies across the formula. A daily supportive amount within safe limits is the goal, rather than replicating a short-term single-agent research protocol. Where a botanical is present at a lower amount than a trial used, that trial result cannot be transferred to Blue Power as a product claim — it is background evidence about the ingredient, not a promise about the tablet.

Frequently Asked Questions About Maca Root for Men

What are the benefits of maca root for men?

Clinical trials in men have examined five areas: self-reported sexual desire, sperm count and motility, erectile function (IIEF-5 scores), physical energy and exercise performance, and broader wellbeing. The most consistent trial finding is from Gonzales et al. (2002), in which gelatinised maca was associated with improved self-reported sexual desire independent of testosterone, and from Shin et al. (2023) for late-onset hypogonadism symptom relief. Most studies used 1,500–3,000mg/day for 8–12 weeks. Note: these trial findings cannot be transferred to Blue Power as a label claim; Blue Power's Maca Root dose is 50mg.

Does maca affect testosterone levels?

No — and that's part of what makes it interesting. In Gonzales et al. (2002) and subsequent RCTs, serum testosterone was measured before and after maca supplementation and showed no significant change, even while self-reported sexual desire and erectile function scores improved. Researchers attribute the observed desire effect to central-nervous-system pathways (probably mediated by macamides) rather than to the hormonal axis. For testosterone, the relevant EFSA-authorised claim belongs to zinc: Zinc contributes to the maintenance of normal testosterone levels in the blood.

How long does it take for maca root to work?

In the Gonzales 2002 trial, sexual desire improvements first reached statistical significance at week 8 of daily 1,500–3,000mg dosing. Fertility improvements in the 2001 trial accumulated over 16 weeks. Across the published RCTs, 8–12 weeks is the standard study period. Don't expect noticeable results in days — a 12-week run is the realistic test.

What is the best form of maca to take?

Gelatinised maca powder is the best-studied form: it removes the indigestible starch that causes bloating in raw maca, concentrates the active compounds, and is what most positive RCTs (Gonzales 2002, Shin 2023) used. Standardised concentrated extracts work well in multi-ingredient formulas at lower mg doses. Maca gummies almost always under-deliver and add unnecessary sugar.

Is maca root safe to take every day?

At doses used in clinical trials (1,500–5,000mg/day for up to 16 weeks), maca has shown a strong safety profile with no serious adverse events. Minor side effects can include mild gut discomfort and occasional sleep disturbance if taken late. Men with thyroid conditions, hormone-sensitive cancers, or those on blood pressure or anticoagulant medication should consult their GP first. The LiverTox database rates maca as "unlikely" to cause liver injury (NCBI LiverTox).

Yellow, black, or red maca — which is best for men?

It depends on your goal. Yellow maca is the most widely studied in human RCTs for general men's health outcomes and is what most early trials used. Black maca has the strongest data for sperm count and exercise performance. Red maca has the most prostate-relevant evidence, though mostly from animal studies. A 2024 review concluded that "not all colours have the same function and must be personalised to the intended outcome" (Beharry & Heinrich, 2024).

The Bottom Line: Is Maca Root Worth It for Men Over 40?

The most distinctive aspect of the maca evidence base is the sexual-desire finding: in Gonzales et al. (2002), replicated in a different population by Dording et al. (2008) and with broader symptom measures by Shin et al. (2023), the effect was consistently independent of testosterone. That CNS-mediated, hormone-neutral mechanism sets maca apart from most other ingredients in the men's health category.

The fertility evidence is more mixed. Individual trials look encouraging, but the pooled meta-analysis on sperm concentration didn't reach significance with high heterogeneity. If fertility is your primary goal, maca is reasonable in a stack but isn't yet a stand-alone fix. The energy and erectile-function evidence sits in between — smaller trials, consistent direction, but more replication needed.

Quality matters. Gelatinised powder or standardised extract from authentic high-altitude Peruvian root, third-party tested, with transparent colour and dose information. For men who prefer a single transparent multi-ingredient tablet over assembling several separate products, a complete formula is the more efficient route than building a six-bottle stack.

Food supplement information. Blue Power is a food supplement, not a medicine. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Food supplements should not be used as a substitute for a varied and balanced diet and a healthy lifestyle. Do not exceed 1 tablet per day. Not suitable for under-18s or pregnant/breastfeeding women. Consult a healthcare professional before use if you are taking medication or have a medical condition.
References & Sources (expand)
  1. Gonzales GF et al. (2002). Effect of Lepidium meyenii (Maca) on sexual desire and its absent relationship with serum testosterone levels in adult healthy men. Andrologia 34(6):367-72. PubMed 12472620
  2. Gonzales GF et al. (2001). Lepidium meyenii (Maca) improved semen parameters in adult men. Asian J Androl 3(4):301-3. PubMed 11753476
  3. Shin D et al. (2023). Efficacy and safety of Maca for the treatment of late-onset hypogonadism: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. World J Mens Health. PubMed 36593713
  4. Zenico T et al. (2009). Subjective effects of Lepidium meyenii (Maca) extract on well-being and sexual performance in patients with mild erectile dysfunction. Andrologia 41(2):95-9. PubMed 19260845
  5. Dording CM et al. (2008). A double-blind, randomized, pilot dose-finding study of maca root (L. meyenii) for the management of SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction. CNS Neurosci Ther 14(3):182-91. PubMed 18801111
  6. Stone M et al. (2009). A pilot investigation into the effect of maca supplementation on physical activity and sexual desire in sportsmen. J Ethnopharmacol 126(3):574-6. PubMed 19781622
  7. Lee HW et al. (2022). Maca (Lepidium meyenii) for improving semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. PMC 9468664
  8. Huerta Ojeda Á et al. (2025). Macamides and physical performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. PubMed 39796542
  9. Holgado D et al. (2023). Effect of black maca on physical performance and inflammation in elite athletes. Nutrients. PMC 10097151
  10. Beharry S & Heinrich M (2024). Lepidium meyenii (Maca): a comprehensive review of its bioactive compounds, traditional and modern uses. Pharmacological Research. PMC 10892513
  11. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury — Maca. NCBI LiverTox NBK548552
  12. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (2012). Scientific opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to Lepidium meyenii (Maca). EFSA Journal — placed on hold pending botanical review.

0 comments

Leave a comment